Login | Register
Items in shopping cart: 0 | View
Dubovcová turns to Constitutional Court again
22 Jul 2014 Flash News
OMBUDSWOMAN Jana Dubovcová has filed another complaint over the laws pertaining to foreigners with the Constitutional Court. According to her, some measures in the law on the residence of foreigners, as well as a law on asylum, violate the Slovak constitution and international conventions.
“The contested provisions enable the police forces and the Migration Office of the Interior Ministry to justify some of their decisions only by the fact that it is ‘a security interest of the Slovak Republic’,” Dubovcová said, as quoted in the press release.
Such justification prevents the affected people from defending themselves properly or from submitting evidence with which they could refute the claims of the police authorities.
“This legislative solution is not in accordance with the requirement of equal status of the parties in proceedings before courts, other state bodies or public authorities,” Dubovcová continued. “Justification referring only to the security interest of the Slovak Republic is not in compliance with the guarantees, which international conventions binding for Slovakia provide for a fair trial.”
The Constitutional Court has already dismissed one motion filed by the ombudswoman, at its March meeting, explaining she was not entitled to submit it. Her office received the decision on July 10.
The new motion contains two new complaints from people who turned to Dubovcová and asked her to turn to the Constitutional Court in this matter.
Source: The Office of the Public Defender of Rights press release
Compiled by Radka Minarechová from press reports
The Slovak Spectator cannot vouch for the accuracy of the information presented in its Flash News postings.
Most read articles
Euro Calculator (Sk30.1260 = 1 EUR)
What influences your travel plans?
Quote of the Week
“Viera Tomanová was on her way to the chamber, but fell on the stairs. Juraj Blanár was three seconds late, [and] Jaroslav Baška came a bit too late.” Deputy Speaker of Parliament Jana Laššáková (Smer) explaining the reasons why Smer did not pass the amendment to the Commercial Code after it was vetoed by the president.