Two Roma get €600 in damages for discrimination

THE OWNER of a bar in the municipality of Spišské Vlachy (in the Spišská Nová Ves district) discriminated against a Roma couple when he refused to serve them in his bar and asked them to leave, according to a court ruling. The Spišská Nová Ves District Court decided the couple should be compensated for the discrimination with €300 each.

THE OWNER of a bar in the municipality of Spišské Vlachy (in the Spišská Nová Ves district) discriminated against a Roma couple when he refused to serve them in his bar and asked them to leave, according to a court ruling. The Spišská Nová Ves District Court decided the couple should be compensated for the discrimination with €300 each.

The incident occurred in December 2009. Roman Pecha, who then worked as teacher assistant, was asked to leave the bar, with the owner reasoning along the lines that if he serves two Roma, in a week 10 Roma would come to the bar.

The court first ruled on the case in 2012, when it decided that Pecha and his wife were discriminated against due to their ethnic origin. The court then ordered the bar owner to publicly apologise, by displaying the apology in writing in the bar as well as publishing it as classified ad in the regional newspaper. No damages were awarded to the Roma couple, however.

In May 2013, the Prešov Regional Court returned the ruling to the court of first instance, ordering it to award damages to the victims of discrimination.

In the recent repeated ruling from May 2014, the district court ordered the bar owner to pay €300 to each of the two persons it discriminated against, arguing that by his conduct, the bar owner interfered with their human dignity.

Lawyer Vanda Durbáková, who represented the Roma couple, welcomes the fact that damages were finally awarded to the couple, but with regard to the international standards, the sum of the damages appears insufficient, she said.

“Financial damages in discrimination cases should not only compensate the discriminated persons, but also have a preventive effect and discourage other subjects from discriminatory behaviour in the future,” Durbáková said.

Pecha and his wife received the verdict five years after the event occurred. He required damage compensation at €1,000. He is now ready to appeal against the sum the court granted him.

In a similar case of Roma from Michalovce, discrimination was found, but no damage compensation was approved, the Sme daily noted.

Source: Center for Civil and Human Rights, Sme

Compiled by Michaela Terenzani from press reports.
The Slovak Spectator cannot vouch for the accuracy of the information
presented in its Flash News postings.

Top stories

Free trains was one of the main measures of the first package.

Smer campaigns with packages

PRIME Minister Robert Fico promises a package with some “interesting surprises” in it to be presented to the Slovak public by the year’s end, and thus only months before the parliamentary elections, taking place in…

Prime Minister Robert Fico

Slovakia to take migrants, opposes resettlement scheme

THE EUROPEAN Commission has published a specific proposal for the resettlement of migrants, with an eye towards alleviating the burden of Greece and Italy, the two southern countries that have faced long-term influx…

Bratislava Castle

Bratislava region sixth richest in the EU, beating Vienna and Prague

IN 2013, the region surrounding the Slovak capital was the sixth richest in the European Union, trailing only places like London, Luxembourg, Brussels or Hamburg. Even Prague – ending ninth – and Vienna (12th) were…

Most-Híd's chairman Béla Bugár

Government approves third report on minority rights

THE GOVERNMENT Office (GO) in 2014 received no motion pointing to a suspicion of violation of the law on using the languages of national minorities, according to a report approved by the government on May 27.