Judicial Council to challenge judicial security clearances at Constitutional Court

THE JUDICIAL Council will turn to the Constitutional Court to determine whether the mandatory across-the-board security screenings that candidates for judicial posts and already appointed judges will have to pass to become eligible for the job are in compliance with the constitution.

THE JUDICIAL Council will turn to the Constitutional Court to determine whether the mandatory across-the-board security screenings that candidates for judicial posts and already appointed judges will have to pass to become eligible for the job are in compliance with the constitution.

“The Judicial Council still cannot send [the motion] since the law becomes effective on September 1,” said its deputy chair Ján Vanko, as quoted by the TASR newswire. He did not specify the council’s main objections to the law.

Vanko also said that the motion includes a request to temporarily halt the effectiveness of the constitutional amendment that pertains to the security clearances.

Though Justice Minister Tomáš Borec said the system for screening judges was set up properly, he admitted that the Constitutional Court could have a different opinion, as reported by TASR.

Several judges are concerned that information received during the security clearance screenings could be used against them. They have also pointed out that the clearances could allegedly be done retroactively and that they could threaten the independence of the judiciary.

As many as 660 out of 1,400 judges supported a statement expressing opposition to security clearances in mid-June. One of the initiators of the statement, Judge Katarína Javorčíková, said that the across-the-board screenings are dangerous as they are based on the presumption of guilt and that judges could be checked without securing the protection of their personal information. She does not have problem, however, with selective clearances.

The Justice Ministry, on the other hand, claims that the judicial clearance screenings should be used to dismiss judges who hold property whose value exceeds their salaries, as well as those who engage in corrupt activities or are addicted to alcohol or drugs, TASR reported.

Source: TASR

Compiled by Radka Minarechová from press reports

The Slovak Spectator cannot vouch for the accuracy of the information presented in its Flash News postings.

Top stories

Finance Minister Peter Kažimír

Draft budget curtails deficit below 2 percent

THE BUDGET deficit should continue decreasing in following three years, according to the first public administration budget draft introduced by the Finance Ministry on July 23.

Crash site

New facts about fatal helicopter crash emerge

THE THREE members of a military helicopter MI-17 crew were training winching up people into helicopter with the help of a rope not practicing landings, when they crashed on July 28 afternoon near Prešov.

Stanislav Boledovič

Teach for Slovakia chief talks education reform

STANISLAV Boledovič, the founder of the Teach for Slovakia project, believes that it helps socially disadvantages children succeed.

Police President Tibor Gašpar

Harabin releases third convicted police officer

Another police officer convicted for corruption was released by the appellate senate chaired by Štefan Harabin with the argument that the police inspectorate that investigated his case is unlawful. The former…