Reader feedback: Treaty revival probable

Re: Court deliberating over motion on EU treaty, Flash News, January 19, 2006

The decision of the parliament is a political one, the court's is a legal one. The former may be easier to arrive at than the latter, and vice-versa, depending on the case at hand.

It is difficult to predict what would happen if France and Holland had voted 'yes'. They didn't.

There will probably be a revival of the treaty, where parts of it regarding the functioning of the institutions will be introduced again and things such as human rights, that for some have too much of a whiff of a real kind of constitution, will be left out. But it will take some years to get to that point.

If the treaty does conflict with, for example, the Slovak Constitution, then the Supreme Court of Slovakia may decide to take up the case. I am no lawyer or legal expert, but that at least seems logical and correct to me. Whether something is called this or that does not mean that the Supreme Court should be left in the dark.

If a case is substantial enough, it should be heard at the highest possible level, no matter what.

Jesper,
Denmark

Get daily Slovak news directly to your inbox

Top stories

News digest: Slovakia tests en mass and launches vaccination of seniors

Health minister admits resignation if alert system not observed. Slovak diplomat has a new lucrative post.

The vaccination in nursing homes started.

A swab instead of a jab. The renamed testing kicked off

The government spent the week deciding about nationwide testing. Lockdown is starting to show in infection numbers, experts say.

Košice

Curfew will be prolonged. Negative test result will be required for work or trips to nature (FAQ)

Here are some of the answers to questions about the ongoing mass testing.

Nitra

Why Trump's Twitter ban is no censorship

The solution is to force Facebook to regulate their content more — not less.