Spectator on facebook

Spectator on facebook


Saktor is finished, but not his era
By Marián Leško

Ivan Saktor has come to the end of his 10-year presidency of the Confederation of Trade Unions [KOZ, a labour union umbrella group]. During his tenure, nothing of importance changed in the KOZ. The unions were in decline before his arrival, and they remain in decline today. What the KOZ was unable to achieve under Saktor as a union organization it will continue to pursue now as a political client [of the ruling Smer party]. Ivan Saktor did it this way for an entire decade.

The nature of Saktor's leadership is best expressed by his own statement: "The aims of unions can be achieved when a political party that is sympathetic to our goals is in a strong position in the political process". The president followed this credo from the beginning to the end. When, in 1997, the Mečiar government passed the Act on Wage Regulation, the KOZ left the tripartite [a formal policy body comprising government, business and labour representatives] and joined the democratic roundtable set up by the then-opposition.

When the KOZ's democratic partners won the 1998 elections and formed the government, Saktor's unions got their reward in the form of the Tripartite Act and a new Labour Code. But when the first Dzurinda government failed to do what the unions expected of it, relations soured to the point that the KOZ regularly called fruitless protest rallies in Bratislava. Few of these rallies had any concrete goal beyond expressing discontent with the Dzurinda government.

When the second Dzurinda government changed the Labour Code back to the way it was, the unions called a referendum on early elections. Ivan Saktor said very clearly what he was after: "We want to prevent this government from ruling for four years". Because the unions began to act towards the government as a radical political opposition party, they were punished with the cancellation of the Tripartite Act.

Saktor and the KOZ leadership then decided that Fico's Smer party understood the unions better, and that they should help Smer win the 2006 elections. Following elections they again got their reward, and again it was one they had achieved not as a union organization but as a political client. Like any client, the unions remain dependent on their masters, for whom they will never be an equal partner.

Political scientists Darina Malová and Palo Rybář wrote that the weakness of Slovakia's unions has historically been due to "the quality of their leadership". Saktor may be leaving today, but the leadership remains in place. And the unions are hanging around Fico's neck.

Top stories

In praise of concrete

It was once notorious for its drab tower blocks and urban crime, but Petržalka now epitomises modern Slovakia.

Petržalka is the epitome of communist-era architecture.

Slow down, fashion

Most people are unaware that buying too many clothes too harms the environment.

In shallow waters, experts are expendable

Mihál says that it is Sulík, the man whom his political opponents mocked for having a calculator for a brain, who “is pulling the party out of liberal waters and towards somewhere completely different”.

Richard Sulík is a man of slang.

Blog: Exploring 20th century military sites in Bratislava

It seems to be the fate of military sites and objects in Bratislava that none of them were ever used for the purposes they were built for - cavernas from WWI, bunkers from WWII, nuclear shelters or the anti-aircraft…

One nuclear shelter with a capacity for several hundred people now serves as a music club with suitable name Subclub (formerly U-club).