EDITORIAL

A history of silence

MIROSLAV Lehký, one of the founding members of the Nation's Memory Institute (ÚPN), worked his last day on May 31. In explaining his decision to quit, he claimed that director Ivan Petranský is emphasizing historical research over documentation, and threatening the mission of the institute.

MIROSLAV Lehký, one of the founding members of the Nation's Memory Institute (ÚPN), worked his last day on May 31. In explaining his decision to quit, he claimed that director Ivan Petranský is emphasizing historical research over documentation, and threatening the mission of the institute. If this charge is true, then it is indeed bad news for the ÚPN. Historical research in Slovakia has become a synonym for camouflage.

In the last 20 years, Slovakia has undergone revolution, reconstruction, Mečiar, Mečiarism, separation, privatization, democratization, integration, and now regression. Who can make sense of this exhausting catalogue without a guide to put it in historical context?

But despite the social importance of their work, Slovak historians have had nothing to say to the public on matters of consequence, such as the phenomenon of Mečiar, what became of former top communists and ŠtB agents, who privatized what, or the social and political forces that produced Robert Fico.

Instead, these questions have been left to journalists and publicists to answer, in works such as Marián Leško's excellent Mečiar a Mečiarizmus (Mečiar and Mečiarism, 1996), Ľuba Lesná's Únos Demokracie (Democracy Kidnapped, 2001), Miloš Žiak's Slovensko Medzi Napredovaním a Úpadkom (Slovakia Between Progress and Decline, 1998), and even such fripperies as Mečiar a jeho Ženy (Mečiar and his Women, 2000) by a pair of journalists with the Nový Čas tabloid daily.

By comparison, international historians have thoroughly explored other events that occurred in the same time frame, such as the First Gulf War of 1990-91 (as well as the second), the Clinton years in Washington, the rise of militant Islam, and even (embarrassingly) the 1989 revolutions and the fall of the Soviet Union.

Historians in Slovakia will tell you that not enough time has elapsed to allow a historical treatment of the last two decades. This may be interpreted to mean that they intend to wait until everyone who could possibly be inconvenienced by their research is dead.

That kind of delicacy may be acceptable in history departments, but it will be disastrous if applied to the ÚPN's work, which is by definition confrontational and uncomfortable.

Lehký claims that the ÚPN under Petranský will spend more time (not) writing articles for specialized historical journals about communism and fascism than documenting the crimes that occurred. If that is true, then he was right to protest. Only time will tell if he was also right to leave the institute to its fate.


By Tom Nicholson

The processing of personal data is subject to our Privacy Policy and the Cookie Policy. Before submitting your e-mail address, please make sure to acquaint yourself with these documents.

Top stories

So blue! Slovakia has another record in UNESCO

It is not easy to create a perfect blueprinted fabric.

Russia expels Slovak military diplomat

He must leave the country within 48 hours.

Illustrative stock photo

Slovak airports have unused potential

But several obstacles prevent their growth.

The Transport Ministry will receive more funds from the 2019 budget to support the development of airports in Slovakia.

How can we improve the integration of foreigners in Bratislava?

Municipalities recognise there is a lack of outreach on the part of administrators to foreigners, but the problem goes both ways.

Several foreigners attended the latest round table hosted by the Human Rights League.