Spectator on facebook

Spectator on facebook

EDITORIAL

Power, interests and national parks

"In politics, especially international politics, values are unimportant; it's always a question of interests, economics and power," said Prime Minister Robert Fico on June 4. This was perhaps more honesty than we are accustomed to hearing from politicians, but it wasn't news.

"In politics, especially international politics, values are unimportant; it's always a question of interests, economics and power," said Prime Minister Robert Fico on June 4. This was perhaps more honesty than we are accustomed to hearing from politicians, but it wasn't news. Fico's government has been living by this code since it took office last year.

At the end of May, for instance, top Environment Ministry officials admitted that they intended to "re-zone" Slovakia's nine national parks, and to decide whether they should all keep their protected status. "If they contain areas that have become degraded or that do not meet the standards of national parks, we will reduce them to the level of protected regional areas," said Environment Minister Jaroslav Izák.

The advertised aim of this re-zoning is to bring the 12 percent of Slovak territory that makes up the country's national parks into line with current needs and financial resources. But whose needs are we talking about here? There is certainly no grass-roots call for fewer national parks in Slovakia; instead, it is loggers, developers and their advocates in government who "need" protected areas to be opened up to exploitation.

And what is this "lack of money" that Izák is talking about? Are we to believe that Slovakia can afford to give Christmas bonuses to pensioners, but not to preserve its national parks? Even if the government were forced to make such bitter budgetary choices in a time of 9-percent GDP growth, couldn't euro-funds be tapped to protect these areas, 80 percent of which are of European significance?

"Opening up" the Tatras and other protected areas to development will not increase tourism, because the real barrier remains poor services, not how many ski lifts you offer. It will not help Slovakia's international image, because it will be reported as and seen for the cynical barbarism that it is. And it certainly won't help the moral climate in this country, which has been poisoned by the "interests, economics and power" approach of the Fico government. What it will do is change these mountain parks forever, wasting decades of conservation for the sake of short-term profit.

Unfortunately, plans to alter the status of national parks are unlikely to be seriously opposed, given the low level of public resistance in Slovakia. The Dzurinda government, for example, was only able to push through its tough economic reforms because the people that were hit the hardest by them did not protest; neo-liberals in other countries watched in envy, knowing they could never get such drastic changes past their own unions. The same will likely apply to "re-zoning"; despite the impact it will have on conservation, people are too apathetic to resist such brutish displays of power, or the communist mentality behind them.


By Tom Nicholson

Top stories

In praise of concrete

It was once notorious for its drab tower blocks and urban crime, but Petržalka now epitomises modern Slovakia.

Petržalka is the epitome of communist-era architecture.

Slow down, fashion

Most people are unaware that buying too many clothes too harms the environment.

In shallow waters, experts are expendable

Mihál says that it is Sulík, the man whom his political opponents mocked for having a calculator for a brain, who “is pulling the party out of liberal waters and towards somewhere completely different”.

Richard Sulík is a man of slang.

Blog: Exploring 20th century military sites in Bratislava

It seems to be the fate of military sites and objects in Bratislava that none of them were ever used for the purposes they were built for - cavernas from WWI, bunkers from WWII, nuclear shelters or the anti-aircraft…

One nuclear shelter with a capacity for several hundred people now serves as a music club with suitable name Subclub (formerly U-club).