Spectator on facebook

Spectator on facebook

EDITORIAL

Manufacturing consent

Independent Rádio Twist has a show called "Black Box," during which listeners can dial in to the station and blow off steam about anything that is giving them grief. In late November 1998, the most frequent cause of agitation among Black Box callers was the bitter economic medicine announced by the new government.
"They're going to raise electricity and heating, and also food prices. What the hell am I going to do? I never should have trusted them," said one man in what has become a fairly standard Black Box tirade. The sense of personal injury generated by Black Box programmes is intense, and barely one caller in ten reminds viewers that the economic hardships they are dreading were brought on the nation by four years of government under Vladimír Mečiar.

Independent Rádio Twist has a show called "Black Box," during which listeners can dial in to the station and blow off steam about anything that is giving them grief. In late November 1998, the most frequent cause of agitation among Black Box callers was the bitter economic medicine announced by the new government.

"They're going to raise electricity and heating, and also food prices. What the hell am I going to do? I never should have trusted them," said one man in what has become a fairly standard Black Box tirade. The sense of personal injury generated by Black Box programmes is intense, and barely one caller in ten reminds viewers that the economic hardships they are dreading were brought on the nation by four years of government under Vladimír Mečiar.

But there it is. The bloom is clearly off the rose for the new government after less than a month, and many voters already seem to regret the haste with which they abandoned the Mečiar ship.

What the cabinet needs now is a clear vision of the future that they can communicate to citizens, a vision that will sustain people through tough economic times with the faith that it will soon all have been worth it.

American intellectual Noam Chomsky argued that in totalitarian or autocratic societies, governments don't have to bother about offering 'visions' to citizens because if anyone complains too loudly he gets taken away in a black van. Politicians can, quite simply, get on with the business of ruling and ignore public opinion.

In democratic societies, however, politicians have to convince voters of the sense of their programmes and of the importance of re-electing them to office. Governing, with all the compromises and dirty tactics it requires, must occur behind closed doors, while public opinion is constantly shaped and courted through the propaganda tools available to the modern state.

Chomsky's model - one in which successful democratic governments must 'manufacture' voter consent through the media, schools and other state bodies - explains much of what happened in Slovakia this November.

The parties of the new government, particularly the ruling SDK, made some extremely rash promises during the election campaign (take for example the vow to double everyone's wages). The average Slovak voter, being an extremely simple soul whose concerns are primarily economic, swallowed such promises and voted for economic - not political - change. EU integration, the rule of law, minority language legislation - meaningless phrases compared to beer money and the monthly rent.

Since September 26, however, the consent of voters to give the former opposition a chance has been lost. Not a whisper has been heard of doubled wages and a brighter economic future; instead, price hikes, budget cutbacks and belt tightening have been on the agenda, and voters quite rightly feel betrayed.

Unlike the former Mečiar government, which ignored voter dissent with impunity (and at peril to itself), this cabinet must set about winning the consent of citizens for the economic path Slovakia must now take. Politicians must sit down in village pubs among resentful people with empty beer glasses and tell them when they can expect a fatter paycheck. They must deliver a new vision of Slovakia's future that does not rest on illusions like doubled wages and quick westward integration.

The Slovak voter is an emotional beast, as any hour spent listening to Black Box will establish. If cabinet does not move soon to manufacture a new mood of consent, its chances of re-election will be small indeed.

Top stories

In praise of concrete

It was once notorious for its drab tower blocks and urban crime, but Petržalka now epitomises modern Slovakia.

Petržalka is the epitome of communist-era architecture.

Slow down, fashion

Most people are unaware that buying too many clothes too harms the environment.

In shallow waters, experts are expendable

Mihál says that it is Sulík, the man whom his political opponents mocked for having a calculator for a brain, who “is pulling the party out of liberal waters and towards somewhere completely different”.

Richard Sulík is a man of slang.

Blog: Exploring 20th century military sites in Bratislava

It seems to be the fate of military sites and objects in Bratislava that none of them were ever used for the purposes they were built for - cavernas from WWI, bunkers from WWII, nuclear shelters or the anti-aircraft…

One nuclear shelter with a capacity for several hundred people now serves as a music club with suitable name Subclub (formerly U-club).