Sme to pay heavy indemnities

The leading opposition daily newspaper Sme paid dearly for its anti-government crusade on August 24, when a Bratislava court found in favour of members of Premier Vladimír Meciar's government in a libel suit and slapped the paper with a penalty of 4.25 million Slovak crowns ($125,000). Both Sme's publisher and lawyer vowed to appeal the decision.
While government officials said that the case, filed two years ago, was a simple one of injury done to their reputations by irresponsible journalists, media representatives called the verdict "ridiculous." The newspaper's publisher, meanwhile, said that both journalists and politicians should become more objective and professional in their conduct.


Slovakia's most virulent opposition newspaper, the daily Sme, got hit with 4.25 million crown fine.
Collage by Slavomír Danko

The leading opposition daily newspaper Sme paid dearly for its anti-government crusade on August 24, when a Bratislava court found in favour of members of Premier Vladimír Meciar's government in a libel suit and slapped the paper with a penalty of 4.25 million Slovak crowns ($125,000). Both Sme's publisher and lawyer vowed to appeal the decision.

While government officials said that the case, filed two years ago, was a simple one of injury done to their reputations by irresponsible journalists, media representatives called the verdict "ridiculous." The newspaper's publisher, meanwhile, said that both journalists and politicians should become more objective and professional in their conduct.

Judge Katarína Fakanová of the Bratislava I County Court delivered the verdict. It obliges VMV, the publisher of Sme, to apologize publicly to members of the government and pay 500,000 Sk ($14,000) to Meciar, 450,000 Sk to each of three Deputy Premiers and 400,000 Sk to the remaining six ministers who joined the suit. The issue at stake was a story published in Sme on May 14, 1996 about a memorial service for held for Robert Remiáš, who was slain in an unsolved car explosion in April 1996. The Sme story quoted a speech from the service as follows: "These are the first victims of the cold war waged on Slovak citizens by their Government." The various ministers claimed in their lawsuit that the story had "caused substantial psychological trauma" to them.

According to a 1997 book by Luba Lesná, "The Kidnapping of the President's Son," Remiáš was a friend and intermediary for Oscar Fegyveres, the witness who testified that the state secret police, the Slovak Information Service (SIS), had been involved in the infamous 1995 kidnapping of the former President's son, Michal Kováč Jr.

"It is ridiculous to sentence a daily newspaper for quoting someone," said Ján Füle, chairman of the Slovak Syndicate of Journalists. Marián Kardoš, director of the Government Press Department, however, pronounced himself satisfied with the verdict. "An independent court decided according to the law," he said, "that several members [of the Government] were unjustly attacked by the daily."

"We are going to appeal it," said Alexej Fulmek, CEO of VMV. "However, if a regional court confirms the verdict, it's over. We cannot appeal to the Supreme Court ."

The case was already tried once, in central Slovakia's Banská Bystrica, where the county court also found in favour of the Government. VMV appealed that decision to the Regional Court in Košice, which sent the case to Bratislava to be retried. According to parts of the Košice court verdict which were published in Sme, "it will be necessary in the retrial for a court to request that [ministers] propose evidence by which a court can assess [the trauma they alleged]."

According to Milan Ruzbarský, the VMV attorney, this trauma was not fully documented. "The court did not deal with the heart of the matter," he said, adding that the judge had only listened to the testimony of the ministers. Ivan Hudec, the Minister of Culture, was quoted in Sme as saying that, as a result of the Remiaš story, "my brother-in-law did not invite me to the wedding of his son."

But the Government vs. Sme is only one of many libel cases involving VMV. "There are numerous suits against us," admitted Fulmek, "and some of those we are probably going to lose." He explained that these concern only stories Sme reprinted from other papers without checking their facts.

However, the danger of being sued is not limited to reprinted information; unnamed and reluctant sources also constitute athreat. "The risks are great as information sources used by our journalists are impossible to bring to court - we are not able to provide those witnesses [there]," said Fulmek. In reponse, VMV is pressing writers to be more careful in their reporting.

The processing of personal data is subject to our Privacy Policy and the Cookie Policy. Before submitting your e-mail address, please make sure to acquaint yourself with these documents.

Top stories

Non-governmental and non-profit organisations will get a new register

NGOs refuse accusations of non-transparent financing.

The new register of non-profit and similar organisations may lead to better synergy.

Following his communication with Zsuzsová, Vanek resigns from his post as prosecutor

Zsuzsová has been charged in connection with the murder of journalist Ján Kuciak.

René Vanek

Jobs, phone calls and banks. What to prepare for after Brexit

Mobile operators and airports do not expect changes.

Kuzmina bids farewell to her career with a victory

Anastasia Kuzmina won the March 21 sprint, while another Slovak biathlete, Paulína Fialková, placed third.

Anastasia Kuzmina and her third globe