Petition committee turned away

Armed with more than 350,000 signatures, members of the opposition petition committee for fair elections and direct election of the President marched into Slovakia's Parliamentary deputies chamber on May 13 to symbolically present their case. But in failing to observe the legal procedures for submitting a petition to Parliament, they gave Parliamentary Speaker Ivan Gašparovič all the reason he needed to deny committee members an audience, and to refuse to discuss the petition in Parliament during the May session.
"No petition arrived [in Parliament]," explained Gašparovič. "A petition is [considered to be] in Parliament only when officials from the Office of Parliament have sorted through the petition sheets, have checked the number of signatures and verified the petition's adherence to formal requirements, and then have submitted the petition to the Parliamentary Constitutional Law Committee. Only then can I put Parliamentary discussion of a petition to a formal vote."


Nice try. Parliamentary Chairman Ivan Gašparovič refused to receive members of the petition committee for fair elections and direct election of the president, citing infractions of legal procedures.
Peter Brenkus

Armed with more than 350,000 signatures, members of the opposition petition committee for fair elections and direct election of the President marched into Slovakia's Parliamentary deputies chamber on May 13 to symbolically present their case. But in failing to observe the legal procedures for submitting a petition to Parliament, they gave Parliamentary Speaker Ivan Gašparovič all the reason he needed to deny committee members an audience, and to refuse to discuss the petition in Parliament during the May session.

"No petition arrived [in Parliament]," explained Gašparovič. "A petition is [considered to be] in Parliament only when officials from the Office of Parliament have sorted through the petition sheets, have checked the number of signatures and verified the petition's adherence to formal requirements, and then have submitted the petition to the Parliamentary Constitutional Law Committee. Only then can I put Parliamentary discussion of a petition to a formal vote."

But Vladimír Palko, the chairman of the petition committee, said that Gašparovič was using legal technicalities to conceal his hostility to the petition itself. "The Speaker of the Parliament is deceiving the Slovak public," Palko said. "He is trying to distract attention from the fact that he didn't receive the petition committee, which came to him with the signatures of hundreds of thousands of citizens."

Palko explained that the petition committee would indeed give the petition sheets to the Office of Parliament, and that he was well aware of the legal niceties involved. But the committee, he said, had also asked Gašparovič in a letter dated May 7 to meet with them on the occasion of submitting the petition to Parliament because "this is the biggest petition drive that has ever occured in this country." Gašparovič's refusal to meet the committee, Palko asserted, was a "very rude sneer towards the citizens of Slovakia," and had convinced the committee not to submit the petition officially for the time being.

Top stories

News digest: Hospital doctors resign en masse

Matovič confidence vote delayed until next week. Cities cut back, tourist sites go dark as authorities look to save energy. Learn more in today's digest.


9 h
Illustrative photo, elections.

How to vote for your local councillors

Foreigners with permanent residence can vote.


15 h
Photo of Ukrainian high-school graduates by Michal Burza won the Current Affairs category as a single photo.

He took the best press photo of the year: we had no idea what terrible things had yet to happen

Photos from Ukraine as well as from Luník IX (Košice) awarded in the annual press photo competition. Winning photos on display in Bratislava's centre for another month.


19 h
SkryťClose ad