Reader feedback: Moral imperative to remove Hussein

Re: Missing the point, Reader feedback, April 7 - April 13, Vol 9, No 13

Ms Belzar,

What I said was that you can't trust al Jazeera when it reports casualty figures. If you want to trust them, you can. But the casualty figures for the war in Afghanistan were grossly exaggerated. So I don't think I'm naive, and I don't believe I'm propagandising.

And yes, it does matter who inflicts civilian casualties. When the coalition does it, it's always unintentional. When Saddam's thugs do it, it's cold-bloodedly deliberate.

I always disagreed with the former American policy of supporting "tyrannical regimes" while we played off one side against the other. I agree that we bitterly and unjustly disappointed the Iraqi people by promising to support uprisings against Saddam in 1991, but then sitting back and doing nothing while Saddam crushed them. That was disgusting and stupid on America's part. But it doesn't mean we shouldn't do something now.

In my opinion, since we propped Saddam up, this makes it even more of a moral imperative for us to knock him down.

Eric M. Roberts

Top stories

News digest: Slovakia marks anniversary of one of its biggest accidents in water transport

People are obliged to show Covid passes, the Bratislava's Old Town promotes its most beautiful trees and construction of the traditional ice house in the High Tatras has started.


6 h
Opening of the time capsule of Michael's Tower.

Time capsule stored in Bratislava's St Michael statue 176 years ago reveals its secrets

The public can see the items found in the box in the Bratislava City Museum at the Old Town Hall this weekend.


8 h
About 100 to 110 Tatra chamois live in the NAPANT national park, central Slovakia, but only two are white.

New Low Tatras attraction fascinates and worries hikers

Two white chamois have been observed in the national park, but their colour exposes them to danger.


21. okt
Skryť Close ad