Spectator on facebook

Spectator on facebook

Former Justice Minister proposes amendment to Criminal Code

A first-degree guilty verdict is sufficient reason for the continuation of custody of an individual until the definitive verdict of the court is reached, according to an amendment to the criminal procedure code that opposition KDH vice-chairman Daniel Lipšic (and former justice minister) submitted to Parliament on March 2, the TASR newswire wrote.

A first-degree guilty verdict is sufficient reason for the continuation of custody of an individual until the definitive verdict of the court is reached, according to an amendment to the criminal procedure code that opposition KDH vice-chairman Daniel Lipšic (and former justice minister) submitted to Parliament on March 2, the TASR newswire wrote.

“It's not acceptable that persons sentenced by the court of first instance for particularly serious crimes – sometimes to life imprisonment – have to be released,” Lipšic told a news conference. Currently, convicted persons who are appealing their cases must be released from custody if the maximum period of custody, which varies according to the nature of the crime, measured against the first-instance guilty verdict elapses during the appeal procedure, reported TASR.

“The accused often commit various obstructions in order to extend the legal proceedings,” said Lipšic. “There are several dangerous persons whose period of custody ends within several weeks.”

He added that he personally didn't care who submitted the amendment. He has sent a letter to Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico, calling on him to submit the amendment in such a way that it will be a government amendment.

“The first-instance verdict represents an automatic deadline for release from custody, even if the prosecutor submits an appeal,” according to Lipšic.

“It's legal and constitutional,” Lipsic said in reaction to a journalist's question whether such an amendment would contravene the Constitution. Lipsic added that there is a long-term practice of the European Court for Human Rights that the first-instance court decision represents sufficient grounds for the continuation of a person’s custody without restricting its maximum period. Lipšic said that it is the current Slovak law which is of an “above-standard” nature.

A Justice Ministry spokesman, Michal Jurči, said on March 2 that by submitting this amendment Lipšic is probably trying to redress mistakes that were made in re-codification of the Criminal Code in 2005 when Lipsic was Justice Minister. TASR

Compiled by Zuzana Vilikovská from press reports
The Slovak Spectator cannot vouch for the accuracy of the information presented in its Flash News postings.

Top stories

My five-year-old daughter will almost certainly encounter a Weinstein too

It’s not that I thought sexually harassing women was okay, it’s more that I accepted that was just part of how things worked. Unfortunate, yes, but also standard.

Harvey Weinstein

Socialism elections were parody of free vote

After the revolution in 1989 the number of people participating in elections fell from 99 percent to around 60 percent.

Elections during socialism regime.

Foreigners: Top 10 events in Bratislava Video

Tips for the top 10 events in the capital between November 17 and November 26, plus regular services in different languages, training, temporary exhibitions and highlights of the year.

Lúčnica

Top 3 stories from Last Week in Slovakia Video

Chinese could produce e-cars in Slovakia - PM Robert Fico does not see election defeat - Poliačik leaves the strongest opposition party

PM Robert Fico