NEWS IN SHORT

Wiretap in 2000 ruled unlawful

THE EUROPEAN Court for Human Rights (ECHR) ruled on June 9 that a state-ordered wire-tapping of attorney Roman Kvasnica was not in accordance with the law, the SITA newswire reported.

THE EUROPEAN Court for Human Rights (ECHR) ruled on June 9 that a state-ordered wire-tapping of attorney Roman Kvasnica was not in accordance with the law, the SITA newswire reported.

In 2000 Kvasnica was assigned by the Slovak government to gather shares of the steel-maker Východoslovenské Železiarne (VSŽ) in Košice in preparation for its sale to the American investor US Steel. He was working as the legal representative of several companies that belonged to a group of strategic steel-making firms in eastern Slovakia. At the same time, Slovakia’s Financial Police were checking the business activities of one of those companies suspected of fraud. For that reason, the Financial Police asked the Regional Court in Bratislava to allow them to tap Kvasnica’s telephone line, the SITA newswire reported.

Kvasnica learned about the wiretapping in 2001. Later on, the records of his phone calls leaked from the police and were available to business and political groups as well as the media.
“I felt absolutely humiliated when my phone conversations got into the hands of the underworld, the Movement for a Democratic Slovakia (HZDS), financial groups and persons against whom I represented the state,” Kvasnica told the Sme daily.

He filed a criminal complaint to the Interior Ministry without any success.

Kvasnica then complained to the ECHR that his right to privacy and respect for his private life had been violated. Eight years later the ECHR ruled that Slovakia had not proven there was any lawful reason for the wiretapping of Kvasnica. The judge of the Bratislava Regional Court who had singularly signed the wiretapping authorisation said he did not know the exact reasons for the request, saying that it was normal at that time, Sme reported.

About a year ago the state offered Kvasnica Sk300,000 (about €10,000) to withdraw his complaint and he refused. At the European court, Kvasnica did not seek any financial compensation; he only wanted a ruling that his rights had been violated.

“I feel satisfaction,” he told Sme.

According to Marica Pirošíková from the Slovak representation at the ECHR, the state will consider who should take responsibility after the ruling is officially delivered, Sme reported.

Get daily Slovak news directly to your inbox

Top stories

Košice

News digest: Slovakia has passed the peak of the second wave, health minister says

Polish doctors will help take swabs in Slovakia this weekend. People who have had COVID can just show their positive test result.

4 h
Rapid testing in Košice

Nationwide COVID-19 testing – and criticism – starts again

Longer ‘screening’ different to October operation.

11 h
Ján Sýkora is an easy-going ice-hockey player who has got a great sense of humour.

Fashion brands mean nothing to me. Professional hockey player about his life in central Slovakia

In an entertaining interview, the down-to-earth ice hockey player, Ján Sýkora, talks about being a busy bee with a poor memory.

21. jan

Old-age pension scheme gains three new features

Brand new parental bonus raises concerns.

23 h