Spectator on facebook

Spectator on facebook

Judges present at controversial party decry media coverage

Supreme Court judges Daniel Hudák, Milan Lipovský, Juraj Seman and Štefan Michalík have attacked the media for its coverage of a party all four attended in autumn last year. The party, in autumn 2010, involved a performance by a retired lawyer in which he apparently imitated the actions of gunman Ľubomír Harman, who weeks earlier had massacred seven people in Devínska Nova Ves. The lawyer, whose audience also included the then-deputy general prosecutor – now acting general prosecutor – Ladislav Tichý, a regional judge from Žilina, another judge from Čadca (Žilina Region) and a law professor, went so far as to don blue ear defenders like the killer's and brandish an imitation assault rifle similar to the one used in the massacre.

Supreme Court judges Daniel Hudák, Milan Lipovský, Juraj Seman and Štefan Michalík have attacked the media for its coverage of a party all four attended in autumn last year. The party, in autumn 2010, involved a performance by a retired lawyer in which he apparently imitated the actions of gunman Ľubomír Harman, who weeks earlier had massacred seven people in Devínska Nova Ves. The lawyer, whose audience also included the then-deputy general prosecutor – now acting general prosecutor – Ladislav Tichý, a regional judge from Žilina, another judge from Čadca (Žilina Region) and a law professor, went so far as to don blue ear defenders like the killer's and brandish an imitation assault rifle similar to the one used in the massacre.

The four Supreme Court judges issued a statement on Wednesday, June 15, saying that only one person had complained.

"Only a single participant of the meeting, who wasn't a judge, reported what the media called inappropriate behaviour. However, there was no organised performance, in which we would be involved. It has never been, nor will it ever be, our intention to dishonour the memory of victims from Devínska Nová Ves in any way whatsoever," the judges said in their statement.

They insisted that any connection between the party and the shooting spree had been artificially created by the media. "Such attacks only distort public opinion," the statement continued, before going on to brand "some politicians who present a certain stance in public while attending real alcoholic and narco-parties in private" as "nothing but populists". The judges did not name any politicians and presented no evidence to back their claims.

Source: TASR

To read more on this story, see Justice Minister Žitňanská objects to event mimicking shooting spree.

Compiled by Zuzana Vilikovská from press reports
The Slovak Spectator cannot vouch for the accuracy of the information presented in its Flash News postings.

Top stories

My five-year-old daughter will almost certainly encounter a Weinstein too

It’s not that I thought sexually harassing women was okay, it’s more that I accepted that was just part of how things worked. Unfortunate, yes, but also standard.

Harvey Weinstein

Socialism elections were parody of free vote

After the revolution in 1989 the number of people participating in elections fell from 99 percent to around 60 percent.

Elections during socialism regime.

Foreigners: Top 10 events in Bratislava Video

Tips for the top 10 events in the capital between November 17 and November 26, plus regular services in different languages, training, temporary exhibitions and highlights of the year.

Lúčnica

Top 3 stories from Last Week in Slovakia Video

Chinese could produce e-cars in Slovakia - PM Robert Fico does not see election defeat - Poliačik leaves the strongest opposition party

PM Robert Fico