Spectator on facebook

Spectator on facebook

NEWS IN SHORT

SaS claims amendment was late

THE SPEAKER of parliament, Pavol Paška, is being asked to explain whether a submission date was changed on a draft amendment proposed by Smer MPs Maroš Kondrót and Andrej Kolesík after Richard Sulík, the chairman of the opposition Freedom and Solidarity (SaS) party, accused the speaker of having improperly done so.

THE SPEAKER of parliament, Pavol Paška, is being asked to explain whether a submission date was changed on a draft amendment proposed by Smer MPs Maroš Kondrót and Andrej Kolesík after Richard Sulík, the chairman of the opposition Freedom and Solidarity (SaS) party, accused the speaker of having improperly done so.

Sulík claims that parliament received the draft amendment after April 17, the deadline for MPs to submit legislative proposals for the next session of parliament, and that Paška backdated the date of receipt so that the draft could be considered at the next session, Sme wrote.

Paška rejected the accusation and said that a parliamentary official had mistakenly written April 18 as the date of receipt of the legislation on the parliament’s website.

Kondrót and Kolesík attached a position statement prepared by the Finance Ministry to their draft amendment which was dated April 18 according to Sme, but Paška’s spokesman, Pavol Chovanec, told the daily that it was possible to add documents such as this at a later date. The daily reported that the draft bill would increase the powers of the state in pricing decisions involving natural gas.

SaS stated that it will request disciplinary action against Paška via parliament’s mandate and immunity committee and Sme wrote that if the committee finds that Paška committed a serious violation of his parliamentary oath it can recommend that he be removed as an MP.

Sme reported on April 25 that records from the Central Register where MPs must deposit their draft amendments for parliamentary sessions showed that the legislative proposal was received on April 17, 30 minutes before the deadline.

However, SaS MP Martin Poliačik said that his party will still file a motion with the parliamentary committee since “nothing has proved that there was no falsification”.

The processing of personal data is subject to our Privacy Policy and the Cookie Policy. Before submitting your e-mail address, please make sure to acquaint yourself with these documents.

Top stories

Parliamentary committee disagrees over President Kiska’s campaign financing

Some members believe Kiska clearly violated the law while others are criticising the committee for acting outside of its jurisdiction.

Andrej Kiska

Slovak women scientists prove that science is not just for men

I grew up with the conviction that science belongs to men, said one awarded Slovak scientist.

Mariana Derzsi and Andrea Straková Fedorková

Five years after the Moldava raid, the victims have turned into perpetrators

June 19 marks the fifth anniversary of the brutal and much-discussed raid in the Roma settlement; and it points to five of those beaten being charged with perjury.

Moldava nad Bodvou

The UK is not cutting off its own hand, it is holding it out

It is not rational to behave towards the UK as if it posed a security risk to the EU.

Illustrative stock photo