Spectator on facebook

Spectator on facebook

What analysts say about the candidates

Pavol Hrušovskýpros - experienced politician, former parliamentary speaker.cons - “old” face, bureaucratic politician, no charisma, very narrow partisan profile, did not succeed as KDH leader, under his leadership a strong group of the party’s founders left.“He has no chance, even if he was the only candidate of the right wing,” Miroslav Kusý said.

Pavol Hrušovský


pros - experienced politician, former parliamentary speaker.
cons - “old” face, bureaucratic politician, no charisma, very narrow partisan profile, did not succeed as KDH leader, under his leadership a strong group of the party’s founders left.
“He has no chance, even if he was the only candidate of the right wing,” Miroslav Kusý said.

Radoslav Procházka


pros - presents himself as “the young candidate”, possesses fresh ideas, ambition and intellectual qualities.
cons - too academic for voters, inexperienced in politics, no partisan background, not a team player, started the campaign too early - voters might grow tired of him by the end of it.
- his candidacy is also a test to support the political party he is planning to establish.
“As a lone runner he might have significant problems succeeding in the elections,” Juraj Marušiak said.

Ján Čarnogurský


pros - possesses intellectual qualities, personifies the KDH’s successful past and the fight against communism.
cons - out of the picture, compromised himself with his enthusiasm for Russia and Putin, is rather old, no political background, not very charismatic.
“He wants to stir interest with his non-conformist opinions, but they are rather problematic,” Grigorij Mesežnikov said.

Andrej Kiska


pros - charismatic, credit for charity work, sympathetic, new face.
cons - not well enough known among voters, no particularly interesting ideas - his campaign only stresses that he is against the current government, his values mirror other nominees, no political experience.
“He is the one that could get closest to Fico in the election result,” Grigorij Mesežnikov said.

Peter Osuský


pros - experienced politician.
cons - represents a small party, not very charismatic.
“Previously, he was a person with more conservative opinions than those of the party he represents, which might leave the voters rather cautious,” Grigorij Mesežnikov said.

The processing of personal data is subject to our Privacy Policy and the Cookie Policy. Before submitting your e-mail address, please make sure to acquaint yourself with these documents.

Top stories

Vallo: I will face up to the people no matter what

The new Bratislava mayor has four broad priorities to accomplish.

Matúš Vallo discusses the municipal elections at the SME daily.

Slovakia has many skilful people. Students should meet them

The new project by the Pontis Foundation tries to motivate young people through stories of successful business people.

The presentation of This is 21 project

Fico sticks with his old-style politics

Only the former PM knows whether the inspiration for his latest stunt was the success of the For A Decent Slovakia-supported candidates in the municipal elections.

Denník N: Danko is a plagiarist

The daily analysed the thesis identical to that of Parliament's Speaker Andrej Danko to find it was copied from textbooks.

Speaker of Parliament Andrej Danko