Spectator on facebook

Spectator on facebook

SLOVAK WORD OF THE WEEK

Nárazník

IF THERE is one bumper (nárazník) you do not want to dent, it’s the one belonging to Štefan Harabin. Firstly, the supreme court boss and former justice minister knows people. Not only are the transcripts of Harabin’s alleged friendly phone conversation with Kosovar drug lord Baki Sadiki well known, he now indicates that his connections with Iranian judges played a role in the release of several Slovak hostages detained for alleged espionage.

IF THERE is one bumper (nárazník) you do not want to dent, it’s the one belonging to Štefan Harabin. Firstly, the supreme court boss and former justice minister knows people. Not only are the transcripts of Harabin’s alleged friendly phone conversation with Kosovar drug lord Baki Sadiki well known, he now indicates that his connections with Iranian judges played a role in the release of several Slovak hostages detained for alleged espionage.

Secondly, Harabin can win even the most ridiculous dispute. The latest in a long line of those who learned this lesson the hard way was the General Prosecutor’s Office, which has to pay Harabin €25,000 just for asking the Constitutional Court to let them investigate suspicions of insurance fraud related to his minor car accident in 2004.

But it’s not only Harabin who’s successful in the courts. This week, the Constitutional Court ruled that they will not strip Supreme Court judge Štefan Michálik, suspected of taking a bribe of his immunity, of his post. No explanation was provided. And there can hardly be any. The need to gain approval before investigating judges is meant to prevent possible abuse of power by the government. But there are no grounds for believing that the prosecutors were trying to harass Michálik in any way. On the contrary, it seems there is a solid case against him. But we will never learn the truth.

Since 2007 the Constitutional Court approved the prosecution of three judges, but turned down nine other requests. There has been talk of reducing judges’ immunity for years, but nothing has ever happened. Add to that everything else that has been going on in the judiciary - the hundreds of judges who filed anti-discrimination charges because their colleagues at the specialised court for combating organised crime had higher salaries; the top members of the judiciary who earned hundreds of thousands in disputes with the media; plus the systematic persecution of critics from within who try to stand up to the system.

And you will understand why it’s easy to see most judges as people who stand above the rules and twist them in their favour. Not exactly the perfect bumper against injustice, is it?

The processing of personal data is subject to our Privacy Policy and the Cookie Policy. Before submitting your e-mail address, please make sure to acquaint yourself with these documents.

Top stories

Institutions can be quickly destroyed, but they are hard to build

Head of the To Dá Rozum intiative, Renáta Hall, talks about the impacts of a dispute between the academy of sciences and the Education Ministry.

Renáta Hall

Man from Russian sanction list trained president’s and PM’s bodyguards

Denis Riauzov is on the sanctions list and the secret services believe he is a Russian agent.

He survived the Paris attacks: Slovakia healed me, he says

I stepped back into life and learned to live again here. I don’t think I could have done it in Paris, says Thomas Tran Dinh.

I found people in Slovakia who try to understand and balance things, says Thomas Tran Dinh.

What does this man know?

Prosecutor searches for witness in the case of Ján Kuciak and Martina Kušnírová’s murder.

Identikit picture of possible witness in Kuciak murder case.