Spectator on facebook

Spectator on facebook

A plebiscite of true national importance

Interior Minister Kaliňák was right to refuse to reduce the success quorum on referenda, but the real problem is too many unsatisfied political egos.

(Source: Sme)

I remember only one thing about that March 1980 Toronto Maple Leafs hockey game. At some point during the match, the rink announcer gave us the results of a referendum in Quebec that had been designed to break up Canada: the answer was 60% negative. I was there, but I don’t remember how old I was, who the Leafs were playing, or how the match finished. What I do remember is the moment of silence after the announcement, then the cheer that rose from the Toronto crowd, and the thousands of people who stood to applaud something that had nothing to do with hockey, but everything with their lives.

Before I came to Slovakia, I never thought to question things like quorums for calling referenda, or the kind of questions that could be asked. In the way that countries bequeath the rules of the game to their citizens, it was ingrained in us that the referendum existed as a rare, non-parliamentary instrument to answer questions so grave that not even the people’s representatives could answer. Issues that only voters themselves could decide.

Over the past two decades, Slovak voters have been called on, at significant expense and even greater insult to parliamentary democracy, to give their opinions on a range of trivial matters, including: whether to ban the privatization of select energy companies, whether to stop gays from adopting kids, and whether to relieve people of the duty of paying dues to public media.

The fact that only one of seven national referenda – about joining the EU – has exceeded the 50% quorum to be valid supports the claim of this article, that referenda should be reserved for matters of true national destiny. Interior Minister Róbert Kaliňák is therefore to be praised for resisting calls to reduce the quorum for calling plebiscites.

But why, then, do frivolous referenda continue to be held? The answer is that Slovakia’s political scene is still achingly immature. In last national elections, 26 (!) parties competed, few of which were more than personal vanity projects or adjuncts to tax scams. Afterwards, even viable politicians who should have remained within the fold to reform their mother parties (e.g. Lipšic, Procházka, Miškov etc.) struck out on their own, with little to show for it. Now, with so many impotent egos begging for our attention, no wonder we are called on to support them through meaningless referenda.

Here’s an idea: Let’s call a referendum on banning all politicians from parliament, and investigating their sponsors and their incomes. That would be a plebiscite of true national importance, regarding a matter politicians themselves are unfit to decide. And I guarantee, the quorum would not be a problem.

Topic: Referendum


Top stories

Crematorium in Bratislava is an architectural revelation Photo

Those who have experienced farewells in other crematoria know what makes it special. Now the best work by the architect Ferdinand Milučký is getting a monograph

Crematorium in Bratislava by architect Ferdinand Milučký

What kind of expectations do some Slovaks have for world leaders?

Among EU member states, opinions of the United States declined in all but two — Poland (which makes some sense) and Slovakia (which does not).

Donald Trump

Crates and boxes. Slovaks discover new ways of grocery shopping

Farmer’s boxes are gaining customers in Slovakia as people slowly become more conscious about quality and the origin of the food they eat.

Foreigners: Top 10 events in Bratislava Video

Tips for the top 10 events in the capital between January 19 and January 28, plus regular services in different languages, training, temporary exhibitions and highlights of the year.

Scandi 4