Spectator on facebook

Spectator on facebook

The president received different wording of ruling

THE VERBAL and written explanation of the ruling issued in the dispute between President Andrej Kiska and three judges whom he refused to appoint to the Constitutional Court differs, the Denník N daily reported.

President Andrej Kiska(Source: TASR)

Under the current law, both versions should be identical. In the past there have been several cases when the Supreme Court or the Constitutional Court turned down the verdict of the lower-instance court because of different wording.

The Constitutional Court was scrutinising the complaint submitted by Eva Fulcová, Miroslav Ďuriš and Juraj Sopoliga whom the president refused to appoint, claiming that they lacked suffiicient experience for the post. It issued a ruling in the case on March 17.

Read also: Read also:Constitutional Court overturns Kiska decision to reject judges

The chair of the senate said that “the right of the president not to appoint the candidate to the constitutional post requires the extraordinary reasons which are so serious that they, from the constitutional point of view, disqualify the candidate from holding the respective post”. He also said that it did not find “any of the facts of such serious or extraordinary character” in the president’s explanation, as reported by Denník N.

The written explanation delivered to Kiska on May 14, however, contained different wording. It did not accept any extraordinary reasons for not appointing the candidates.

“The constitution clearly defines the duty of the president to appoint exactly one half of the chosen candidates to the Constitutional Court post,” the court wrote, as quoted by Denník N. It also claimed it did not even scrutinise the explanation of the president.

The senate deciding in the case was composed of Ľubomír Dobrík, Jana Baricová, who was the only candidate Kiska actually appointed, and Rudolf Tkáčik. The last one wrote a different opinion to the statements and reasons for the ruling, according to Denník N.

Ján Mazák, the president’s adviser and his lawyer, was surprised by the differences in the ruling.

“I do not understand it,” he told Denník N. He added that the Constitutional Court has not made such a mistake before.

Top stories

Kysuce highway stalled due to missing money

Money is missing to finish the section of highway between Žilina and Poland, stopping the completion of the D3 highway project.

Road-blocking protest in Povina, Kysuce, demanding completion of highway bypass - February 16.

Slovak film won Generation Kplus section at Berlinale

The film Little Harbour that won the Crystal Bear – beating movies from many other countries - is the work of (mostly) Slovak women.

Director of Little Harbour, Iveta Grófová, with the Cristal Bear

State insulation falls behind expectations, ministry widens support

Only 134 homeowners in the first round and 62 in the second applied for a subsidy via the insulation programme.

Only 134 homeowners in the first round and 62 in the second applied for a subsidy via the state insulation programme. Illustration stock photo

US philosopher with Slovak roots, Michael Novak, dies

The man who advised politicians and even presidents Gerald Ford and James Carter died on February 17, aged 83.

Michael Novak