Spectator on facebook

Spectator on facebook

Slovakia and migrants

FICO’S rejection of refugee quotas hurts Slovakia, not the migrants who don’t want to come here in the first place.

(Source: AP/TASR)

So Slovakia will be providing only token aid to resolve Europe’s refugee crisis. Having blocked an EU-wide quota system to resettle around 60,000 migrants, which would have brought about 1,000 North Africans to Slovakia, Fico and comp. have generously offered to find homes for 200 hand-picked Syrian Christians. Who, even if they ultimately win asylum in Slovakia, will presumably be free (undestands as: encouraged) to move on to wealthier EU destinations.

No doubt our leaders are merely obeying the wishes of Slovakia’s xenophobic majority. Like Catholic Poland, ours remains a closed society that is hostile to ethnic and sexual minorities, doubly so if they weren’t born here. As much as liberals may have yearned for it, this country was never going to extend its hand to a bunch of war-weary Arab exiles, especially with elections in eight months and a populist government in power.

 

Read also:Government to house refugees in Gabčíkovo

To be fair, it probably makes little difference to the refugees themselves. Media reports from squalid camps in Italy, Greece and Calais show that most migrants are headed north in search of work and established North African communities. In pushing for a quota resettlement scheme, the EU was trying to distribute ownership of the refugee crisis among all its members rather than just first-contact countries in the south, or destination countries like the UK and Germany. Which was another well-meaning, bureaucratic idea that ignored the most important variable at play here: the human intention of the migrants themselves.

But Slovakia’s churlish stance matters a great deal in terms of the international order to which it belongs. Once again, Bratislava has refused to act responsibly in an EU crisis (migrants, Greece, Ukraine), despite itself having accepted billions in EU development aid since 2004, and having profited in other ways from its EU membership (years of record foreign direct investment followed by the adoption of a shared currency that provided insulation from the worst effects of the global recession). Jean Asselborn, foreign minister of Luxembourg, the country currently holding the EU presidency, called our decision on migrants “embarrassing”. Others might have stronger words for it.

Maybe Fico is right, and the most sensible path is to continue sucking benefits from our EU membership while shirking our membership duties. Maybe, after another decade or two of drawing EU funds, we will be in the position of never again having to accept help from another country. But until then, and while the memory of our own Western succor is so fresh in our minds, we should stop acting like selfish teenagers in a house of responsible adults. As the man said, it’s embarrassing.

The processing of personal data is subject to our Privacy Policy and the Cookie Policy. Before submitting your e-mail address, please make sure to acquaint yourself with these documents.

Topic: Migration crisis


Top stories

Automotive industry and e-commerce drive the industrial sector

Western Slovakia with Bratislava remains the strongest locality.

Prologis Park Bratislava

Investigative journalists awarded for their bravery

Seven journalists received the White Crow award for defending the public good. The organisers of For a Decent Slovakia were given a special vote of thanks.

The award-winning journalists

Will sisters Paulína and Ivona Fialková represent Slovakia at the Biathlon World Cup?

The Slovak Biathlon Union has banned them from participating but has also registered them for the World Cup.

Paulína (left) and Ivona Fialková

How to elect your mayor

When you live in a small village, you don't care about Bratislava. At home, everything is at stake.