Court finds violation of Roma woman’s rights

THE CONSTITUTIONAL Court has overturned the ruling in a case of a Roma woman who unsuccessfully took legal action against discrimination in her access to employment.

Illustrative stock photoIllustrative stock photo (Source: TASR)

The lower instance courts violated Viera Pompová’s guaranteed right to a just court process, the court said, as reported by the TASR newswire.

“This decision might significantly improve the odds of many individuals who are being discriminated against to secure justice in discrimination lawsuits,” said Pompová’s lawyer Vanda Durbáková of the Centre for Civil and Human Rights, as quoted by TASR.

Pompová applied for a job as a social worker in Spišská Nová Ves (Košice Region) back in 2010. Despite the fact that she met the requirements in terms of education and multi-year field experience with social work in Roma communities, the job went to another candidate of non-Roma origin, who was less qualified and did not have any command of the Roma language.

“Even the Social Development Fund, which financed the position at the time, voiced doubts over the lawfulness of selection proceedings based on Ms Pompová’s complaint, yet it was too late for the selection to be reversed,” said Durbáková, as quoted by TASR.

Subsequently, the unsuccessful applicant turned to the courts, seeking to redress the discrimination. In 2012, the Spišská Nová Ves District Court turned down her complaint as unsubstantiated. This decision was reaffirmed also by the Košice Regional Court in 2013, prompting Pompová to bring her case to the Constitutional Court on the grounds that the previous verdicts violated her right to just court proceedings, guaranteed under the Slovak constitution and a number of international treaties. Pompová stated before the Constitutional Court that the district and regional courts had ignored her objections and arguments, while incorrectly interpreting both the domestic and international anti-discrimination legislation, when they requested her to provide evidence to back her claims that (according to the anti-discrimination laws) need to be supplied by the accused party.

The case will now return back to the regional court.

“To me, the verdict of the Constitutional Court represents a satisfaction because after years of demanding justice, I’ve finally lived to see the Constitutional Court ordering lower courts to deal with my case again,” Pompová said, as quoted by TASR. “I hope that they’ll rule on it justly. Also, I hope that the verdict will help other people, whose civic and human rights are being trampled.”

The Roma woman has received free-of-charge legal counsel and representation from Košice-based NGO Centre for Human and Civil Rights, TASR wrote. 

Get daily Slovak news directly to your inbox

Theme: Roma community

Read more articles by the topic

Top stories

How a Catholic charity became a voice for migrants in Slovakia

Religious organisations have added leverage in changing perceptions of foreigners and migrants, says Caritas Slovakia.

Caritas Slovakia's ‘World Without “the Other” – Migration Myths’ campaign educates Slovaks on migration in a fun and artistic way.

Secret votes and public lies

There are uncanny echoes today of Slovakia’s agonies over its choice of chief prosecutor ten years ago.

Dobroslav Trnka (left) and Jozef Čentéš (right), the candidate who was eventually selected by MPs in 2011, never got to take up the post because the then president, Ivan Gašparovič refused to appoint him for reasons that were never clearly explained.

Which are the largest law firms in Slovakia?

For the first time, the ranking also provides an overview in partial categories of law.