Spectator on facebook

Spectator on facebook

2013 amendment to law on collective bargaining deemed unconstitutional

THE SLOVAK Constitutional Court ruled on March 16 that the amendment to the law on collective bargaining from 2013 regarding the extension of the binding force of collective bargaining agreements of higher degree is unconstitutional.

Constitutional Court chair Ivetta Macejková (C-with former president Ivan Gašparovič-R and the incumbent, Andrej Kiska).(Source: Sme)

The amendment, proposed by the ruling Smer party, was attacked by a group of 32 opposition MPs, who complained that it entitled the ministry to extend the binding force of these collective contracts without having to consult the employers to whom it directly pertains. They argued that the law infringed upon the right to private property as well as the right to do business. The law also did not guarantee that the balance between public and private interests would have been preserved, the TASR newswire wrote.

Former Slovak president Ivan Gašparovič (2004-14) also had reservations concerning this amendment back in 2013; however the parliament overruled his veto.

According to the Constitutional Court, the Slovak Constitution, as well as the Treaty on Protection of Fundamental Human Rights and Freedoms were violated by the provisions of this law in paragraph 7, articles 1, 2 and 11. 

“Lifting the collective agreement of a higher level, which contains the pledges of contractual sides, into a generally binding legal act – through a ruling of a central body of state administration published in the Slovak Collection of Laws – for subjects others that bound by this agreement exceeds the frame of constitutionally acceptable creating of norms,” chairwoman of the CC, Ivetta Macejková, stated in her argumentation.

The combination of choosing the legal form of generally binding lower-than-law legal enactment to extend a two-or multi-lateral agreement also to other contractual subjects – and stipulating the facultative character of this extension, moreover – in two articles of Paragraph 7 of the law on collective bargaining is incompatible with the principle of rule of law, according to the Constitutional Court.

The Labour Ministry, which drafted the law, opined that it is necessary to respect this ruling of the CC. Spokesman Michal Stuška informed TASR that they would have to study the whole argumentation and then react duly.  The ministry argued in the past that it mainly wanted to improve the labour-law conditions for employees, through extending the binding character of collective agreements of higher level. It also argued that the extension of collective agreements is an element of labour relations also in several western-European countries, citing Belgium, France, Germany, The Netherlands, Portugal and Spain as examples.

Top stories

Prosecutor withdraws charges of libel against journalist

The journalist originally received an 18-month suspended sentence with three years of probation.

The CT scanner scandal cost Pavol Paška his post as speaker of parliament.

Several Christians disagree with Church’s stance towards extremists

The extremist ĽSNS party drafted a bill limiting abortions in Slovakia, creating an awkward situation for the Church.

Illustrative stock photo

“I will not be playing ice-hockey anymore,” says Hossa

Health issues have caused the NHL player to withdraw from matches and consider moving back to Slovakia.

Marián Hossa kisses the Stanley Cup won by his Chicago Blackhawks team in June 2015.

A happy marriage? Both simpler, and tougher, than we realize

If experience is the mother of wisdom, why aren’t second and third marriages more successful?