Spectator on facebook

Spectator on facebook

Financial Times: V4 profits from the EU

The economic daily points to the critical approach of V4 towards Brussels, despite using its benefits.

V4 leaders (l-r): Slovak PM Robert Fico, Czech PM Bohuslav Sobotka, Polish PM Beata Szydło, Hungarian PM Viktor Orbán(Source: TASR)

Though the countries of the Visegrad Group (V4) benefit from the European Union, they are seeking to overturn its institutions. This is how economic daily, The Financial Times  (FT) commented on the members of the club, i.e. the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland and Hungary, shortly before the September summit due to be held in Bratislava.

The FT reported, as cited by the ČTK newswire, that though the central European countries do not maintain the claim that they would be better off without the EU, as supporters of Brexit did, they resent it when Brussels interferes with their domestic affairs or forces them to adopt solutions with which they disagree. This concerns, for example, the mandatory refugee quotas, 

“Blame our communist heritage,” one Visegrad minister told the Financial Times, “but we don’t like it when the policy is defined elsewhere and then we are told to implement it.”

Read also: Read also:Migration and Brexit will be key issues of EU summit in Bratislava

The FT points to the fact that before entering the EU, the V4 governments were very keen to win backing in support of pro-European reforms. After the 2008 economic crisis their hopes that they would quickly catch up with western countries have failed. Also the bankruptcy of Greece and the migration crisis have revealed some flaws.

“The bride turned out not as pretty as advertised,” said Otilia Dhand, a Slovak-born analyst with Teneo Intelligence, as quoted by the Financial times. “The EU is probably the best of the realities that [CEE citizens] can imagine. It’s just that they are not particularly optimistic about the reality they see right now.”

V4 now seeks for an EU based on increased co-operation between capitals, with some powers handed back to member states, and Brussels-based institutions curbed. Beyond that, however, divergent interests may make it difficult for them to agree on any detailed blueprint, the Financial Times wrote.

The FT also pointed to the increase in the radical opinions held by the V4 countries, particularly in Hungary and Poland.

As for Slovakia, the paper pointed to the fact that Slovak PM Robert Fico used anti-European emotions in the campaign for the March 2016 parliamentary election.

Top stories

They reported corruption at the Foreign Ministry. Now they receive an award

The tenth year of the White Crow award, celebrating young people and activists who break prejudices and go against the tide.

White Crow award laureates

The day that changed the Tatra mountains for good Photo

The windstorm damaged 12,000 hectares of woods on November 19, 2004.

Tatras after the 2004 calamity

Smer follows a downward trend but may escape oblivion

What does the defeat in regional elections mean for the future of Slovakia’s strongest party?

“How could it be a fiasco when a political party wins most councillors among all parties?” asks PM Robert Fico.

Valorisation mechanism changes

But not everybody is satisfied with some of the latest changes.