Spectator on facebook

Spectator on facebook

Constitutional Court to deal with dispute over ŠtB files

The Nation’s Memory Institute still disagrees with the verdict of the Supreme Court concerning listing Czech Finance Minister Andrej Babiš as an ŠtB agent.

Ondrej Krajňák, head of the Nation’s Memory Institute (Source: Sme)

The Nation’s Memory Institute (ÚPN) has turned to the Constitutional Court over its dispute with Czech Finance Minister of Slovak origin Andrej Babiš.

The institute calls for cancelling the verdict issued by the Supreme Court in February with which it turned down the extraordinary appeal of the ÚPN. If the Constitutional Court accepts the complaint, the whole case will return to the Constitutional Court, the SITA newswire reported.

“As ÚPN chair I cannot allow our past to be redrawn by controversial court rulings,” chair of the ÚPN board Ondrej Krajňák said, as quoted by SITA.

Read also:Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Babiš case

The ÚPN considers the Supreme Court ruling illegitimate and claims the court should have discussed the appeal and cancelled the rulings issued by the lower-instance courts in the dispute with Babiš, who was allegedly listed as an agent cooperating with the communist-era secret police ŠtB.

The institute points to several non-standard events and circumstances that occurred at the Supreme Court before dismissing the appeal.

“On its own initiative, the Supreme Court asked the Interior Ministry to exempt former ŠtB agents who testified in Babiš’s favour at the district court from the pledge of confidentiality,” the ÚPN claimed in an official statement, as quoted by SITA. “With such a move, the Supreme Court wanted to additionally rectify the illegal testimonies of these witnesses.”

Moreover, the ÚPN claims the court did so without offering the institute the ability to comment on it. The Supreme Court closed the case only two working days after receiving the controversial decision on exempting the former ŠtB agents from confidentiality.

The ÚPN has already lost the dispute with Babiš in June 2015, after the Bratislava Regional Court had confirmed the ruling of the district court.

The appeal will now be discussed by a Constitutional Court senate composed of Ladislav Orosz, Ľudmila Gajdošíková and Lajos Mészáros, the TASR newswire reported.

The processing of personal data is subject to our Privacy Policy and the Cookie Policy. Before submitting your e-mail address, please make sure to acquaint yourself with these documents.

Top stories

Spectacular Slovakia #3: Unexpected hiking (Enjoy Bratislava's greenery) Audio

In Slovakia, you can hike in the capital city. Listen to the latest episode of our travel podcast to find out more.

The Financial Administration’s head resigns from post

František Imrecze says his decision was spontaneous.

František Imrecze

People will gather to support imprisoned Ukrainian filmmaker

The open letter in support of Sentsov has been signed by more than 2,800 people.

People hold posters to support Ukrainian filmmaker Oleg Sentsov, who is currently on hunger strike in a Russian jail to demand the release of the other Ukrainian hostages taken by the Kremlin, in front of the Embassy of the Russian Federation in Kiev on August 21, 2018.

Institutions can be quickly destroyed, but they are hard to build

Head of the To Dá Rozum intiative, Renáta Hall, talks about the impacts of a dispute between the academy of sciences and the Education Ministry.

Renáta Hall