Nation’s Memory Institute Head Ondrej Krajňák resigns from his post

The reason is the coalition’s amendment to the law changing the way in which the institution is managed and curbing his powers

Ondrej Krajňák, left, announced his resignation from the post of the Nation’s Memory Institute (ÚPN) head. Ondrej Krajňák, left, announced his resignation from the post of the Nation’s Memory Institute (ÚPN) head. (Source: Ondrej Krajňák, Nation’s Memory Institute, ÚPN)

The Nation’s Memory Institute (ÚPN) head, Ondrej Krajňák, is resigning from his post as of November 1, due to the coalition’s amendment to the law concerning the ÚPN. He argues that it has significantly changed the way in which the institution is managed and has curbed his powers.

SkryťTurn off ads
Article continues after video advertisement
SkryťTurn off ads
Article continues after video advertisement

Krajňák is concerned that purges might occur at the ÚPN because the board of directors, as a collective body, has become its statutory authority and he doesn’t want to participate in this new system.

He has already handed in his notice as an employee but he will remain on the ÚPN’s board of directors until the end of its term. He wants to convene a meeting of the board as early as the beginning of November but it is questionable whether the ÚPN’s new chairman will be elected in time for this meeting.

SkryťTurn off ads

Read also: Political prisoners are against Memory Institute reform Read more 

“Efforts to change the law came at a time when the ÚPN had gained respect not only at home, but also abroad,” said Krajňák as cited by the TASR newswire. “The amendment’s submitters in their explanatory report cite the desire for effective management of the institution among the reasons for the legislative change, but nobody will bear personal responsibility for the potential damage caused while managing the ÚPN.

He also pointed to the fact that according to the submitters, the legislative change was also made necessary by tense relations within the ÚPN.

“If this was actually among the motives for changing the legislation, the amendment has been personified, which contradicts the Constitution, as the law must be generally valid and cannot concern a particular case,” said Krajňák, adding that the reasons for adopting the amendment must have been much deeper.

SkryťTurn off ads

He added that the ÚPN was fully engaged in prosecutions concerning former members of the communist-era intelligence service (ŠtB). In addition, the ÚPN has detailed and published the complete structure of the ŠtB on Slovak territory dating back to 1966, called for increased pensions for political prisoners and has been constantly reminding everyone of the actions taken by criminal regimes and at the same time, naming specific culprits.

“These are the actual reasons why the MPs of the governing coalition came up with the amendment,” he said.

Top stories

Slovakia marks 20 years since joining NATO.

Slovakia marks 20 years in the Alliance.


Daniel Hoťka and 1 more
Píšem or pišám?

"Do ľava," (to the left) I yelled, "Nie, do prava" (no, to the right), I gasped. "Dolšie," I screamed. "Nie, nie, horšie..." My Slovak girlfriend collapsed in laughter. Was it something I said?


Matthew J. Reynolds
Czech biochemist Jan Konvalinka.

Jan Konvalinka was expecting a pandemic before Covid-19 came along.


SkryťClose ad