Security company Bonul competed with itself

The Public Procurement Office insists that the competition was manipulated and fined the state-run social insurer.

Dušan MuňkoDušan Muňko (Source: TASR)

Managers of the state-run social insurer Sociálna Poisťovňa violated the law. They prepared a public procurement worth nearly €6 million in late 2015, when the insurer was led by current Smer MP Dušan Muňko, so that it enabled the victory of the security company Bonul, led by Miroslav Bödör, known for close links to Smer and police representatives.

SkryťTurn off ads
Article continues after video advertisement
SkryťTurn off ads
Article continues after video advertisement

This stems from the revelations of the Public Procurement Office (ÚVO), which fined the insurer €25,000, the Denník N daily reported.

“Regarding the seriousness of the violation, which is part of the protocol, the fine was set at the highest possible amount,” said ÚVO’s head Miroslav Hlivák, as quoted by Denník N.

SkryťTurn off ads

Unfair tender

The ÚVO comptrollers clearly say that the procurement was unfair since it did not allow a fair and open tender. They explained that the combination of qualification conditions set by Sociálna Poisťovňa’s management could have prevented several companies from participation.

For example, the managers were asking applicants for documents confirming that they not only have guards and respective security licences, but that they be able to install the security system and have a special system integrator C4 certificate. However, the certificate is not easy to obtain. When ÚVO scrutinised the competition, only two companies in Slovakia had the certificate, one of them being Bonul.

Read also: How an unknown collaborator with Široký took control over EU-funds Read more 

As a result, Bonul competed with itself, Denník N wrote.

ÚVO says that it would have been better to divide the entire procurement among several smaller orders.

SkryťTurn off ads

Moreover, if the insurer had observed the law, it would probably had saved some money, ÚVO added, as reported by Denník N.

The insurer will go to court

ÚVO has already fined the insurer, which has appealed, so now the procurement office only confirmed its previous decision. The insurer can still turn to the courts, which it promises to do soon, Denník N wrote.

“Sociálna Poisťovňa considers the fine inappropriate and will ask the court to postpone the enforcement of ÚVO’s decision,” said Sociálna Poisťovňa spokesperson Peter Višváder, as quoted by Denník N.

The insurer, now led by Ľubomír Vážny of Smer, is still defending the tender, while Muňko claims that before announcing it, the tender had been checked by ÚVO and no errors were found. He also says that ÚVO has no relevant evidence that more candidates could not have participated in the tender.

Read also: Kaliňák survived more than 10 scandals Read more 

Non-affiliated MP Miroslav Beblavý says that the fine should be paid by Muňko. However, it is not very probable since the insurer does not plan to ask him to, as reported by the Denník N daily.

Top stories

Ernst Willers – Greek Sea, after 1870, Ernest Zmeták Art Gallery in Nové Zámky, GNZ

Weekend: A trip to the sea...in art

Bodies of water in art, summer markets and foreign movie nights. Here's what to do for the weekend of June 9 -11.


9. jun
Vrakuňa’s citizens presented apples washed in water with leaked toxins at the protest in 2016.

Chemical time bomb in Bratislava’s Vrakuňa keeps ticking

The state is failing to solve leaking chemical waste dump.


31. may
Jupiter (centre) and its Galilean moons: from left Ganymede, Io, Europa and Callisto. Juice with deployed antennas and arrays is in the bottom right.

From Košice to Ganymede: Slovak engineers are leaving their mark in space

Slovaks are active participants in two ongoing space missions.


20. may
The future of safer abortion in Slovakia is still unknown.

News digest: Health minister ponders politically fraught abortion pill decision

Summer in Bratislava, the future of stores, and the general prosecutor objects to a sentencing decision.


9. jun
SkryťClose ad