UPDATED: 27. MAR 2019, AT 13:47

Harabin files complaint over the presidential election

Supreme Court Judge Štefan Harabin came third in the first round of the presidential election, meaning he did not advance to the run-off.

Supreme Court judge Štefan Harabin during his presidential campaign in 2019. Supreme Court judge Štefan Harabin during his presidential campaign in 2019. (Source: TASR)

Supreme Court Judge Štefan Harabin, who came third in the March 16 first round of the presidential election, has filed a complaint over the presidential election with the Constitutional Court.

“Regarding the presidential election, I am filing a constitutional complaint as it was not held in a constitutional and legal manner,” Harabin said in a video posted on Facebook.

Problems with financing the campaign?

Read also:Anti-system and extremist candidates did not prevail but showed their strength Read more 

Harabin questioned the way Zuzana Čaputová finances her campaign, as stems from the complaint. Harabin does not like the fact that Robert Mistrík, who had withdrawn from the presidential run before the first round in favour of Čaputová, financially supported her.

“Candidates have circumvented the law on the financing of their campaigns,” he claimed, as reported by the Sme daily.

In the March 16 vote, Harabin received 307,823 votes, which represents 14.34 percent of the vote.

The law stipulates that the complaint must be filed within 10 days after the election results are officially announced, Harabin explained in the video.

He is also ready to file another complaint after the second round of the presidential election, scheduled for March 30.

No one to decide on the complaint

Harabin filed the complaint when the Constitutional Court cannot deal with it since it is lacking sufficient judges to create a plenum. There are only four of 13 Constitutional Court judges, since the parliament has failed to elect the replacement for the nine judges whose tenure ended in mid-February. The next vote will take place at the ongoing parliamentary session.

“This is a crisis situation,” said lawyer Peter Kubina, as quoted by Sme. “The Constitutional Court has statutory time limits within which it has to decide.”

The court can deal with the complaint in April at the earliest, but it may be even later as coalition MPs have not agreed on the candidates for Constitutional Court judges, Sme wrote.

If the court cancelled the election result, it would also be questionable as to what it would mean for the newly-elected president and his/her decisions, experts claimed, as reported by Sme.

Get daily Slovak news directly to your inbox

Theme: Election

Read more articles by the topic
This article is also related to other trending topics
Presidential election 2019

Top stories

How a Catholic charity became a voice for migrants in Slovakia

Religious organisations have added leverage in changing perceptions of foreigners and migrants, says Caritas Slovakia.

Caritas Slovakia's ‘World Without “the Other” – Migration Myths’ campaign educates Slovaks on migration in a fun and artistic way.

Secret votes and public lies

There are uncanny echoes today of Slovakia’s agonies over its choice of chief prosecutor ten years ago.

Dobroslav Trnka (left) and Jozef Čentéš (right), the candidate who was eventually selected by MPs in 2011, never got to take up the post because the then president, Ivan Gašparovič refused to appoint him for reasons that were never clearly explained.

News digest: Slovakia to spend three Advent weekends with testing. President wants it to be voluntary

Seven candidates for the general prosecutor post approved. Acting general prosecutor steps down.

Installation of Christmas tree in Trnava

Which are the largest law firms in Slovakia?

For the first time, the ranking also provides an overview in partial categories of law.