Journalists can write freely about the Gorilla file

The Penta financial group has failed with its lawsuit at the Constitutional Court.

Penta residence in the Digital Park, BratislavaPenta residence in the Digital Park, Bratislava(Source: Sme)

Media can refer to, cite, and write freely about the infamous Gorilla file, describing the non-standard relations between high-ranking politicians and businesses, the Constitutional Court ruled.

It scrutinised the lawsuit submitted by the Penta financial group against the Hospodárske Noviny daily, which used a citation from the file in one of its opinion pieces, the Denník N daily reported.

The court issued its statement, written by the senate composed of Lajos Mészáros, Jana Laššáová and Sergej Kohut, on February 6.

Read also:What were the links between Kočner and Penta? Read more 

“The existence of transcripts of the Gorilla file is unchallenged (the question of authenticity is a different matter),” reads the ruling, as quoted by the Sme daily. “The reference of a journalist to the Gorilla file, regardless of the authenticity being confirmed or not, thus provides a sufficient factual basis for the contested statements, the object of which is the assessment/analysis of the content of the file or conclusions drawn from it.”

The Gorilla file describes the alleged meetings between Jaroslav Haščák of Penta with various politicians in a flat on Vazovova Street in Bratislava between the years 2005 and 2006. They allegedly discussed or even took bribes, Sme wrote.

Penta and politicians have been challenging the contents of the file. The recordings found in the safe of controversial businessman Marian Kočner could prove its authenticity, according to the daily.

Read also:Penta wants investigators to destroy Gorilla recordings Read more 

At the same time, the Constitutional Court has criticised the lower instance courts for demanding journalists to check the document’s authenticity.

“It is absurd to require journalists to replace law enforcement bodies in any way,” the ruling reads, as quoted by Sme. This would mean that journalists would not be able to cite from the file, which is “unacceptable in regards to freedom of speech protection”.

Disclaimer: The Penta financial group has a minority share in Petit Press, the co-owner of The Slovak Spectator.

The processing of personal data is subject to our Privacy Policy and the Cookie Policy. Before submitting your e-mail address, please make sure to acquaint yourself with these documents.

Top stories

My parent was a foreigner: Slovakia has second-generation immigrants too

Otherness can be smaller than we think, the photo project of Tomáš Halász and the Milan Šimečka Foundation shows.

Right of reply changes send wrong message on press freedom

How can a government that spends time looking for new ways to harass the press be trusted to secure accountability for the state’s failure to protect journalists?

Journalists, who were screened in 2017, are considering turning to court.

Why are they passing a law for politicians instead of protecting journalists?

Right of reply was introduced out of the wrong motivation with wrong timing.

The media is freer, but also feels less secure.

The court has toughened the sentence for Acorda's killer

Convicted Juraj Hossu initially received six years in prison this May.

The regional court in Bratislava overturns the district court's previous decision in the Henry Acorda case on September 17. Acorda's murderer Juraj Hossu will spend nine years in prison