Court to rule about Kočner's case two days before elections

Closing speeches were read in the promissory notes case on February 12. Prosecutor demands 20 years in prison for the defendants.

Pavol Rusko (left) and Marian Kočner (right) attend a trial on February 12, 2020. Pavol Rusko (left) and Marian Kočner (right) attend a trial on February 12, 2020. (Source: Sme)

The case of the TV Markíza promissory notes worth €69 million, in which Marian Kočner and Pavol Rusko stand accused, is coming to an end after half a year. The court heard closing speeches on February 12 and is expected to deliver its ruling before the end of this month.

SkryťTurn off ads
Article continues after video advertisement
SkryťTurn off ads
Article continues after video advertisement

Related article Handwriting expert testifies against Rusko: Signatures are from after 2013 Read more 

Kočner has been claiming the sum based on the notes from TV Markíza since 2015. The company, however, sued him and Rusko three years later, claiming the notes were forged. Rusko and Kočner were then charged with forgery and with marring justice. Both defendants claim the promissory notes were signed around 2000, but no expert has confirmed this during the investigation and the trial. Instead, it is said they were signed after 2013. Markíza also has not found any promissory notes in its accounting documents.

SkryťTurn off ads

After the Specialised Criminal Court’s senate heard all seven closing speeches on February 12, it decided a verdict will be announced on February 27, just two days before the 2020 elections.

Marian Kočner and his lawyer Michal Mandzák, Pavol Rusko and his lawyer Marek Para, prosecutor Ján Šanta, and lawyers representing TV Markíza, Daniel Lipšic and Tomáš Kamenec, all read their speeches.

Although lawyers of the accused wanted the court to hear other witnesses, the court rejected the idea. Instead, the senate studied tens of misdemeanours committed by Rusko and Kočner. These may have an impact on the senate’s decision.

Rusko and Kočner also commented on witness testimonies on February 11. Rusko, who has been rejecting any wrongdoing since the trial started, on July 22 of last year, said that “the trial is not just and is tendentious”, as reported by the Sme daily.

SkryťTurn off ads

Rusko comes up with US conspiracy

The rest of this article is premium content at Spectator.sk
Subscribe now for full access

I already have subscription - Sign in

Subscription provides you with:
  • Immediate access to all locked articles (premium content) on Spectator.sk
  • Special weekly news summary + an audio recording with a weekly news summary to listen to at your convenience (received on a weekly basis directly to your e-mail)
  • PDF version of the latest issue of our newspaper, The Slovak Spectator, emailed directly to you
  • Access to all premium content on Sme.sk and Korzar.sk

Top stories

Stock image.

Twice as many Ukrainians work in Slovakia now than before the Russian invasion.


Píšem or pišám?

"Do ľava," (to the left) I yelled, "Nie, do prava" (no, to the right), I gasped. "Dolšie," I screamed. "Nie, nie, horšie..." My Slovak girlfriend collapsed in laughter. Was it something I said?


Matthew J. Reynolds
Czech biochemist Jan Konvalinka.

Jan Konvalinka was expecting a pandemic before Covid-19 came along.


SkryťClose ad