Spectator on facebook

Spectator on facebook

Constitutional Court overturns Kiska decision to reject judges

PRESIDENT Andrej Kiska breached the fundamental rights of selected candidates for the posts of Constitutional Court judges to take up elected and non-elected public offices under equal conditions when he refused to appoint them last July, according to a March 17 decision by the Constitutional Court's third senate, the TASR newswire reported. 

President Andrej Kiska(Source: SME)

The Court decided that Kiska violated the rights of judges Eva Fulcová, Juraj Sopoliga and Miroslav Ďuriš. The Constitutional Court at the same time overturned the respective decision of Kiska to reject the three candidates on July 2, 2014 and obliged him to deal with the issue again. Furthermore, the President’s Office is supposed to pay the three judges the costs associated with the court proceedings.

Back in July 2014, Kiska decided not to appoint five out of six candidates for three vacant posts of judges at the Constitutional Court that were elected by the Smer-dominated parliament. Following personal interviews with the bidders, Kiska decided to appoint only one judge - Jana Baricová. All five rejected candidates subsequently challenged the president’s decision with the Constitutional Court.

The case of the two remaining judges - Ján Bernát and Imrich Volkai - is being dealt with by another Constitutional Court senate, which has not come to a decision yet.

The decision is confusing and does not explain wherein the alleged violation of the complainers’ rights occurs, according to Kiska’s legal representative and former Constitutional Court head Ján Mazák.

The most serious fact is that it appears that actually only one judge in the senate made the difference, said Mazák, adding that Kiska’s complaint against possible bias of senate member Jana Baricová, who was personally involved in the appointments last year, was rejected.

“Senate Chairman Rudolf Tkáčik adopted a different stance, he does not agree with the verdict,”  Mazák said as quoted by TASR. “There was a judge who really lacked impartiality. This means that one vote in this senate decided on the result of these proceedings. It’s a precedent that I can’t understand.”

The processing of personal data is subject to our Privacy Policy and the Cookie Policy. Before submitting your e-mail address, please make sure to acquaint yourself with these documents.

Top stories

Marian Kočner and Pavol Rusko released

Kočner and Rusko will not be held in custody while they are under prosecution for forging promissory notes to the private TV channel Markíza.

Pavol Rusko (front) and Marián Kočner

Long breakaway gives Slovak championship to Sagan, surprising everyone Video

Even former cycling legend and sports commentator Jan Svorada was shocked by the breakaway which secured Sagan's sixth victory in the Slovak championship.

Peter Sagan wins the Czech y Slovak Championship, June 24, 2018

Threats, scandals, and dubious political ties. Who is Marian Kočner?

The businessman with many ties to politicians has been detained by police.

Marian Kočner

Blog: Human Capital in Slovakia: Preparing for the next industrial revolution

A closer cooperation between business and academia is of key importance if Slovakia is to strive in the ongoing industrial revolution.

In centres of excellence, a group of skilled workers is using brand new technologies.