Matovič may keep his mandate, for now

The committee will wait for the ruling of the Constitutional Court.

Igor MatovičIgor Matovič (Source: TASR)

The parliamentary committee for conflict of interests has still not closed the case of Igor Matovič, head of the Ordinary People and Independent Personalities (OĽaNO-NOVA), who has not suspended his business licence.

Since it is not the first time he forgot to suspend it, he may lose his parliamentary mandate. The committee however wants to wait for the verdict of the Constitutional Court which is currently dealing with the first fine Matovič received in the matter, the TASR newswire reported.

The committee has recently fined Matovič with a sanction amounting to his six-month salary, i.e. some €12,000, for violating the constitutional law on conflict of interests. The MP however turned to the court to confirm it. The senate composed of Lajos Mészáros, Ľudmila Gajdošíková and Ladislav Orosz discussed the case in closed session on November 4, but postponed the talks, ordering the judge rapporteur to submit a proposal to unite the differing legal opinions, TASR wrote.

Read also:Matovič asked to suspend his self-employment licence Read more 

The Constitutional Court’s spokesperson Martina Ferencová has not provided any further details, so it is not clear whether the opinions differ on whether the law is violated by having a business licence though the public official is not actively doing business or if the business is still active.

Matovič claims that he has not violated the law as his business is not active, though he had not suspended his licence. Having a business licence does not automatically mean that the person actively does business, he added.

Read also:Matovič faces charges for slandering FicoRead more 

In this respect Matovič referred to the previous verdict of the Constitutional Court which claimed that the parliamentary committee should not check whether a public official actively does business or not. It should act if there is a possibility of doing business, which also includes renewed business licences, as reported by TASR.

The members of the parliamentary committee for conflict of interests agreed that the court can confirm the verdict but can also change it. If this happens, the committee would probably not be able to fine public officials for not having a business licence suspended if they did not actively carry on their business. The committee would thus have to check whether and how public functionaries do their business.

Get daily Slovak news directly to your inbox

Top stories

How a Catholic charity became a voice for migrants in Slovakia

Religious organisations have added leverage in changing perceptions of foreigners and migrants, says Caritas Slovakia.

Caritas Slovakia's ‘World Without “the Other” – Migration Myths’ campaign educates Slovaks on migration in a fun and artistic way.

Secret votes and public lies

There are uncanny echoes today of Slovakia’s agonies over its choice of chief prosecutor ten years ago.

Dobroslav Trnka (left) and Jozef Čentéš (right), the candidate who was eventually selected by MPs in 2011, never got to take up the post because the then president, Ivan Gašparovič refused to appoint him for reasons that were never clearly explained.

Which are the largest law firms in Slovakia?

For the first time, the ranking also provides an overview in partial categories of law.