Spectator on facebook

Spectator on facebook

UPDATED: 20. JUN 2017, AT 23:45

UPDATED: Antimonopoly Office stops investigation of presidency orders

The Foreign Affairs Ministry welcomes the decision, but the ethics watchdog says the scrutiny lacked depth.

the Slovak EU Council Presidency (Source: Jozef Jakubco)

The Antimonopoly Office (PMÚ) halted the investigation of competitions for some events organised in connection with Slovakia’s Presidency of the EU Council, which took place during the second half of 2016.

“This means that the office did not find any violation of the law on the protection of economic competition when scrutinising the available documents and information,” the Foreign Affairs Ministry wrote on its Facebook profile.

The decision disproves the claims of “suspicious orders” and allegedly non-transparent competitions for events linked to the presidency, the ministry said.

The Foreign Affairs Ministry was referring to the statements of former employee Zuzana Hlávková and two of her former colleagues, who had reported on overpriced orders and fictitious tender linked to the EU Council presidency.

The ethics watchdog Transparency International Slovensko (TIS) meanwhile responded that the PMÚ has not scrutinised the orders in depth.

Read also: Read also:TIS: More people trust whistleblower Hlávková than Foreign Ministry

It also pointed to the fact that the ministry is refusing to publish all the documents concerned with the competition to choose the organiser of the cultural events linked to the EU Council presidency. The ministry had even refused to give all necessary documents to the PMÚ. Although it eventually received the papers, the names of the companies that allegedly “competed” with the winner of the order to prepare the ceremonial introduction of the presidency’s logo, the agency Evka, were concealed, TIS informed.

“Can we even believe that the Foreign Affairs Ministry gave complete documents to the PMÚ when the office had to repeatedly ask for a complete set of the materials to be scrutinised?” TIS asked.

The whistleblowers who pointed to the dubious competitions meanwhile persist with their claims that the winners were chosen in advance and the competition was only for effect.

Topic: EU presidency


This article is also related to other trending topics: Corruption & scandals

Top stories

Product quality laid on the EU table

Concerns over the different quality of same brand products are confirmed, but will anything change soon?

Will shopping in supermarkets soon become a thing of the past?

Education minister fails to explain distribution of EU money

The opposition parties plan to initiate a no-confidence vote, the second against this minister.

Education Minister Peter Plavčan

Who will stand up for journalists in Turkish prisons?

Journalists living in countries where politicians (for now) do not send people to prison for their opinions, who only sigh in relief that they are lucky this story does not concern them, are deeply mistaken.

Protesters in front of the court building.

EU court’s advocate general proposes to dismiss quota lawsuits

Yves Bot rejects arguments from Slovakia and Hungary on the legality of the relocation plan.

Refugees at the border between Hungary and Serbia.