26. March 2018 at 06:30

Anti-corruption laws are toothless

Anti-corruption measures did not have a strong influence.

Peter Adamovsky

Editorial

Pavol Szalai and Zuzana Hlávková reported on dubious practices during Slovakia’s EU Council Presidency. Pavol Szalai and Zuzana Hlávková reported on dubious practices during Slovakia’s EU Council Presidency. (source: SME)
Font size: A - | A +

In speeches about tackling corruption, authorities have often highlighted the positive results of the law on the protection of whistleblowers and the anti-shell law, approved during the ruling Robert Fico’s governments.

SkryťTurn off ads
SkryťTurn off ads
Article continues after video advertisement
SkryťTurn off ads
Article continues after video advertisement

Ethics watchdogs, however, believe that in practice the anti-corruption measures adopted in the last two years do not have such a strong influence.

“They only deal with isolated problems and not always vigorously,” Peter Kunder of the ethics watchdog Fair-Play Alliance told The Slovak Spectator.

The government even ignored some important measures, including the latest EU rules in the fight against money laundering, Kunder said, which should have been transposed in summer 2017.

Is Slovakia still in the bosom of corruption?
Read also:
Is Slovakia still in the bosom of corruption?

Reporting tool

The first valid measure, the Act on Certain Measures Related to the Reporting of Anti-social Activities, targets the protection of people who decide to blow the whistle on their employers or colleagues who do not conduct business in an ethical way.

SkryťTurn off ads

The law, first approved in 2015, is now subject to an amendment establishing a special authority to help educate and protect whistleblowers and control property admissions. The amendment is currently in inter-departmental comments, Peter Kovařík, head of the Corruption Prevention Department of the Government’s Office, confirmed for the public-service broadcaster RTVS.

Tomáš Strémy from the Faculty of Law at Comenius University in Bratislava assesses the existing wording of the act as beneficial. However, the regulation itself does not address the question of social education and the courage of people.

The rest of this article is premium content at Spectator.sk
Subscribe now for full access

I already have subscription -  Sign in

Subscription provides you with:

  • Immediate access to all locked articles (premium content) on Spectator.sk

  • Special weekly news summary + an audio recording with a weekly news summary to listen to at your convenience (received on a weekly basis directly to your e-mail)

  • PDF version of the latest issue of our newspaper, The Slovak Spectator, emailed directly to you

  • Access to all premium content on Sme.sk and Korzar.sk

SkryťClose ad