Opinions on not inviting Kotleba differ

ANALYSTS disagree on their views on the decision of President Andrej Kiska not to invite chair of the far-right People’s Party – Our Slovakia (ĽSNS) to post-election talks.

Marian KotlebaMarian Kotleba (Source: SME)

The president did not want to explain in detail why he refused to invite Marian Kotleba. He only hinted that “a radical political extremism in uniforms made it to the parliament”, as reported by the Sme daily.

SkryťRemove ad
Article continues after video advertisement
SkryťRemove ad
Article continues after video advertisement

Also other leaders of parliamentary parties, except for Boris Kollár of Sme Rodina (We Are Family), said they would ignore ĽSNS, while Kotleba responded that all parliamentary parties and the president are on one side.

Such behaviour, however, is nothing extraordinary. Former Czech president Václav Havel, for example, did not invite communists to discuss the creation of government, Sme wrote.

Read also: President Kiska will authorise Fico to form government Read more 

The reasons why Kiska is doing this are obvious as the president behaves in compliance with his previous rhetoric, political analyst with the Comenius University in Bratislava Pavol Baboš told Sme.

“He is a representative of the liberal part of voters with strong value principles,” Baboš added.

Analysts, however, differ in their opinion on what impact such behaviour would have. Some say that Kotleba may be depicted as an unwanted and aggrieved leader of a parliamentary party, while others approve the president’s decision.

Political analyst Michal Cirner approves Kiska’s behaviour, saying that there is no reason to negotiate with extremists, as reported by the public-service broadcaster Slovak Radio (SRo).

Though Ivan Chorvát of the Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica (UMB) says that it is not necessary to meet with extremists, he adds that it depends on the situation. He assumes that the president maybe should have met with Kotleba, especially when he talked to other leaders of parliamentary parties.

SkryťRemove ad

“He could thus tell him his opinion on his policy or that his values are inconsistent,” Chorvát said in a talk show broadcast by the Slovak Television (STV).

Political analyst Peter Spáč says that the decision cuts both ways. On one hand, it would be difficult to explain to “standard” politicians why to meet with him at any level. On the other hand, Kotleba is not new in politics and he already serves as governor of the Banská Bystrica Self-Governing Region. The ignorance may only motivate his party’s supporters to vote for it again, he told STV.

Marián Majer, head of the Slovak Institute for Security Policy, lists several impacts the behaviour may have. The party’s popularity may increase and it may become part of the political mainstream as it happened in France. On the other hand, the party may become marginalised as other political subjects will use the same opinions as ĽSNS to appeal to their voters, as reported by Sme.

Top stories

News digest: LGBT+ people better off in Malta

From Bratislava to Komárno with a new rail operator. Take a look at timeless Czechoslovak glasses.


8 h

Village burnt down but thanks to contest it is one of Slovak symbols now

Ease your hiking muscles in a spa after a two-hour hike with incredible views and a walk through time.


27. jul
Altogether 131 refugees from Ukraine are accommodated at the premises of the Prešov prison; the capacity of the facility is 151 people. The original inmates were moved to Sabinov. The picture features an angel in the Ukrainian national colours created by one refugee and her son as a thank you gift for visitors.

It's August and I really want to go home to Ukraine

A Ukrainian refugee, mother of two, tells the story of her escape to Slovakia and the six months she has lived here so far.


15. aug
Slovak Foreign Minister Ivan Korčok.

Slovakia plans no ban on all Russians from entering the country

The country would most likely support an EU-wide ban.


16. aug
SkryťClose ad